Americans love your Constitution, even with that faults. And also it has surely had some faults throughout its much more than 2 centuries—some huge faults that have been remedied, choose slavery and also Prohibition, and also numerous smaller sized ones that are still with us, prefer the ascendancy that has prevented the current governors that California and also Michigan from giving themselves as presidential candidates.

You are watching: Everything you know about the constitution is wrong

A close study of the means the Constitution has been placed on paper—either written or printed—during its lengthy life is certain to call our fist to its the smallest faults—its errors the penmanship and typography.

It is not surprising the a couple of such errors have actually crept in throughout all these years, when the original Constitution and also an ever-growing body of amendments were composed out top top a few occasions and also printed thousands of times. Many of the errors of the scribes and the typesetters to be promptly corrected before we, the analysis public, had a opportunity to notice them, yet a few have sustained in successive publications.

Learn more about:

The earliest of the Constitution"s errors were made by the scribe who developed the engrossed (written in a fine ring hand) parchment and the printers who produced versions the the newly completed document in September 1787.

Production of the engrossed copy must have actually occupied much of the weekend remaining after the Convention"s adjournment so late on Saturday, September 15. The scribe to be Jacob Shallus, assistant clerk of the Pennsylvania legislature. The did a fine job provided the short time that had, dispersing the much more than 4,000 words throughout four large sheets of parchment.

After he finished, Shallus had to attend to several mistakes that he had actually made during that rushed weekend the exacting labor. Plenty of of the mistakes were omissions, and also he tried to take treatment of every by inserting a native or two in between the lines. Yet he likewise used a penknife to scrape away whole line that text close to the bottom of page one, leave behind a roughed-up band the now appears gray from grime.



Jacob Shallus had actually to scrape away whole line near the bottom the the structure s an initial parchment page. (General records of the U.S. Government, RG 11)



On the critical sheet of the engrossed Constitution, Shallus added a record of the corrections he do on the document. (General documents of the U.S. Government, RG 11)

Another correction was the an outcome not the a mistake, yet of a last-minute adjust of mind by the Convention during the Monday session, as soon as it increased the preferably allowable number of representatives indigenous one per 40,000 persons come one per 30,000.

Also on page one room a variety of ink splotches huge and small, which arisen in the effort to complete this huge document. Writing with a quill pen to be a challenge.

On the critical sheet, Shallus enrolled a record of the insertions so no one could think these can be illegitimate additions to the embraced text. After making his convey of the populace per representative, Shallus defined it in his note of corrections: "The word Thirty being partially written on an Erazure." Erasing octopus isn"t easy, and also Shallus"s effort to scrape far "forty" is quickly detectable.

Alexander Hamilton provides an Error

Providing proof of the an obstacle that us all confront in gaining things right, Shallus managed to make a wrong in one of his corrective notations. He wrote of "the word "the" being interlined between the forty 3rd and forty 4th Lines of the second Page," but the insertion actually shows up six currently farther down on the page, in between lines 49 and also 50. What"s more, the scribe overlooked, and also omitted from the note, another insertion the "the," just two present farther down from the critical error discussed in the note.

Yet one more error shows up on the engrossed copy of the Constitution. It was committed no by Jacob Shallus yet by Alexander Hamilton. As the members the the Convention all set to sign the document, Hamilton take it up a position alongside the last of the 4 sheets, laid the end for signing, and also appears to have actually taken charge of the process as the delegates from each state come forward come sign. In this capacity, he created the name of each state at the left of the cultivation column the signatures. As soon as he came to the biggest state delegation, top by Benjamin Franklin, he composed "Pensylvania." and thus the parchment reads today.

While Shallus was spending much of the weekend inscribing those four sheets, the Philadelphia printers john Dunlap and David C. Claypoole to be busy through an equally vital task: developing 500 copies of the Constitution, part to be offered to the Convention delegates together they departed, and also some to be transmitted come the congress of the Confederation.

The text produced by Dunlap and also Claypoole included a couple of more flaws. It have to have included the uncorrected "forty thousand"; it likewise cannot have had actually a correct list of the signers, for when the Convention started its final day, the members did no know precisely who was going to authorize the document. There was a determined yet unsuccessful effort, led through Benjamin Franklin, to carry aboard three delegates who had not cursed themselves—Edmund Randolph, George Mason, and also Elbridge Gerry. There was additionally some doubt, right up to the end, around another member—William Blount of phibìc Carolina—who lastly did sign.

We do not know how the publish of Monday, September 17, faced these uncertainties. No copy of that print has actually ever pertained to light. (We do understand that the printing to be done, for the contain a document of payment come the printers big enough come cover two jobs, each running to 500 copies or more.) reportedly the stack of 500 prints to be held carefully by someone and not distributed. Otherwise, a few copies would likely have migrated right into the documents of part members and could currently be found preserved in various


Dunlap and also Claypoole s September 18, 1787, to press of the structure misstated a date by 100 year (one thousand 7 hundred and eight). Succeeding printings corrected the 7 to eight.

When Dunlap and also Claypoole listed a new printing that the constitution to the departing delegates ~ above Tuesday morning, September 18, it consisted of a exactly "thirty thousand" and precise list of the signers but introduced a new error. In short article V, in the i that forbade, prior to the year 1808, any amendment affect the servant trade, or the article 1 half on levying direct taxes without apportionment, the date was created as "one thousand 7 hundred and eight."

We have the right to perhaps charge this error to force of habit on the component of whichever member of the Convention"s committee ~ above style and also arrangement to be responsible for conveying the last decisions to the printers, or on the part of the printers. This error appeared in a few of the newspaper printings the the Constitution, both in Philadelphia and brand-new York, during the next few days; these to be soon changed by exactly copies and also faded right into history.

An Error-Free version Appears

As the Republic moved right into the brand-new century, and also the Constitution was reproduced by numerous printers, a new kind the error started to it is in noticeable. This to be the presence, in countless prints, of a scattering of small variations in punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and other stylistic details. The reason of any kind of of these is impossible to ascertain, however they for sure origi

nated partly as typesetting errors and partly as a result of the printers" idiosyncratic stylistic tastes.

This textual variability was enhanced by one unfortunate aspect of the published Constitution"s life history. For plenty of decades after ~ 1787, the national government failed to embrace and spread an official printing that the structure in booklet or broadside form. There to be a copy that the constitution at the former of the bound volumes containing the nation"s laws, but these tomes were unlikely to be discovered in a print shop. In the absence of a recognizable official print, the nation"s printers were obliged come copy everything print could be in ~ hand.

The an outcome was the propagation and multiplication the a few irregularities in the beforehand prints. Simply a few days after Dunlap and also Claypoole produced their print, man McLean of new York, the Confederation"s printer, developed his very own version, v a couple of small stylistic variations. A casual mindset to details the punctuation and also orthography, i m sorry prevailed among printers and publishers in the nation"s early on years, permitted errors or irregularities come multiply.

William Hickey, a member of the Senate"s clerical staff, i found it this situation in the 1840s as he prepared a text of the Constitution for printing. Hickey to be struck by the inadequacies of the currently prints. "A published copy (considered as correct) to print from, was found to contain several errors in the words, and sixty-five in the punctuation."

Hickey comment by publishing, in 1847, a copy the the structure from i m sorry he had taken pains to banish every error. He placed this structure at the former of a 225-page hands-on of the national government that he had produced, i beg your pardon in the course of numerous editions he broadened to 521 pages.

The publication contained a certificate through Secretary of State James Buchanan, heralding that Hickey"s printed Constitution "has to be critically contrasted with the originals in this room & discovered to be correct, in text, letter, & punctuation. that may, therefore, it is in relied upon together a conventional edition." (Buchanan"s original was the engrossed, signed original of 1787, in the custody the the department of the State.)

Hickey published several version of his manual, through the constitution at the front, throughout the 1850s. After ~ his death, the administrator of his legacy published new editions in 1878 and 1879, v a certification by another secretary that state (Hamilton Fish) attesting to the accuracy that a Constitution the now consisted of the 3 Civil war amendments.

With his mindful work and also the broad dissemination that his print, william Hickey to win a mighty punch for error-free reproduction the the Constitution. His occupational was lugged forward during the late 19th century and also afterward through the government Printing Office. A contemporary pamphlet version of the Constitution, published by the GPO because that a congressional committee, bears a close same to Hickey"s print.

Modern printings that the Constitution that follow the engrossed copy that the original deserve to be established by the plenty of stylistic functions in i beg your pardon Jacob Shallus"s calligraphy departs native the style of the printers that 1787. The most conspicuous difference is Shallus"s capitalization of virtually all the nouns, in comparison to the very limited presence of capital letters in the work of the printers. The capital letters now assist to provide quotations indigenous the Constitution, as soon as taken from modern prints the follow the engrossed copy, an waiting of authenticity.

In the 17th Amendment, not a Typo, but an Error

While the careful work that Hickey and also the vigilance that the GPO have spared united state the type of arbitrarily stylistic variation the plagued prints that the structure in the early on 19th century, one more kind of error put in an appearance in the 20th century. This errors might be called, no typographical, however congressional: failure committed, not by printers yet by the members of conference or your staff, that were responsible because that shepherding the message of one amendment v the congressional process.

See more: Usps Post Office Princeton Junction Post Office In West Windsor, New Jersey

It might be argued that the language as proposed by Convention or Congress and also duly ratified by the says is the classic text, and also by an interpretation When this might be true when the structure is being understood by the courts, a different standard is proper in a text to be offered by citizens and students. By this standard, the Constitution has two errors—textual elements that its authors did not intend and that room grammatically or substantively incorrect.