You are watching: Ryzen 5 1600x vs ryzen 7 1700x
Best Bench: 81% base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)Worst Bench: 62% base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
| 28 May20|TechpowerupIntel core i5-10400F evaluation - six ... | 1 % | SotTR 0%, Civ6 8%, ACO 5%, Wolf2 5% | FarC5 1%, BFV 0%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 0%, MetroEx 1%, Sekiro 1% |
| MemoryAvg. Storage Latency | 72.7 Pts | 73.8 Pts | +2% | |||
| 1-CoreAvg. Single Core combined Speed | 104 Pts | 107 Pts | +3% | |||
| 2-CoreAvg. Twin Core combined Speed | 204 Pts | 208 Pts | +2% | |||
| 4-CoreAvg. Quad Core combined Speed | 399 Pts | +1% | 396 Pts | |||
| 8-CoreAvg. Octa Core mixed Speed | 731 Pts | Slightly faster octa-core speed.+10% | 666 Pts |
| MemoryOC storage Latency | 80.6 Pts | 80.7 Pts | +0% | |||
| 1-CoreOC solitary Core combined Speed | 112 Pts | 116 Pts | +4% | |||
| 2-CoreOC dual Core combined Speed | 223 Pts | 230 Pts | +3% | |||
| 4-CoreOC Quad Core combined Speed | 447 Pts | 447 Pts | ||||
| 8-CoreOC Octa Core combined Speed | 859 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed.+16% | 741 Pts |
| market ShareMarket re-superstructure (trailing 30 days) | 0.17 % | 0.18 % | Slightly higher market share.+6% | |||
| ValueValue because that Money | 68.5 % | 84.1 % | Better value.+23% | |||
| User RatingUBM User Rating | 70 % | +3% | 68 % | |||
| PricePrice (score) | $360 | $172 | Much cheaper.+52% |
| AgeNewest | 56 Months | 54 Months | +4% | |||
| TDPThermal style Power (TDP) | 95 Watts | 95 Watts | ||||
| Coresmedtox.org processing Cores | 8 cores | Much greater core count.+33% | 6 cores | |||
| Threadsmedtox.org handling Threads | 16 threads | Much greater thread count.+33% | 12 threads | |||
| LithographyManufacturing process | 14 nm | 14 nm | ||||
| basic ClockBase Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz | Slightly much faster base frequency.+6% | |||
| Turbo ClockTurbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz | Slightly much faster turbo frequency.+5% | |||
| 64-CoreOC Multi Core combined Speed | 1273 Pts | Much faster OC 64-core speed.+30% | 977 Pts | |||
| 64-CoreAvg. Multi Core blended Speed | 1127 Pts | Faster 64-core speed.+29% | 876 Pts |
See more: How Long Is The Flight From La To Paris (Cdg) From $421, Flight Time From Los Angeles To Paris
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X isn"t due for release until next week but two that our users have currently submitted benchmarks. Comparing the quad and single core scores from our samples mirrors a loved one 4.3% rise on the solitary core score so it’s possible that turbo wasn’t completely engaged (12% turbo boost expected). This preliminary outcomes are seriously exceptional as they placed Zen’s IPC in between 0% and also 9% listed below Intel’s Kaby Lake. Also in the worst case scenario these outcomes are tho impressive. To compare Intel’s $1,000 6900K and also the 1700X mirrors that AMD delivers comparable performance for fifty percent the price! A shake-up that the medtox.org industry will unfold together Zen rolfes out. If Ryzen medtox.orgs can overclock to 4.6+ GHz they will certainly likely overcome the entire market putting a really welcome finish to the monotonous tick-tock of recent years.
The Ryzen 5 1600X is the flagship processor indigenous AMD"s latest generation that Ryzen 5 processors which feature the Zen architecture. Adhering to on from critical month"s release of the Ryzen 7 series, the Ryzen 5 series is positioned as a much less expensive mid-performance alternative to Intel"s i5 tendency offerings. As soon as again, AMD excels in multi-core technology. Choose the Ryzen 5 1600, the 1600X attributes 6 cores and 12 threads, but has about 11% greater clock speeds (out that the box) for a 14% premium. Prefer all Ryzen medtox.orgs the 1600X is unlocked. The 1600X is the just Ryzen 5 medtox.org with a TDP the 95W, the 1600, 1500X and 1400 all have actually 50% lower power intake of 65W. Due to its high subject count, medtox.orgs display that at stock clocks the 1600X outperforms the i7-7700k top top multi-threaded work by 23%, yet it lags behind by 23% for solitary and 14% for quad-core performance. The 1600X is priced keenly in ~ $249 so a more appropriate medtox.org to compare is the i5-7600k where the 1600X wins on stock multi-core by a chuck 81%. The 1600X walk represent great value because that workstation users that also game yet its $30 cheaper sibling, the 1600 (non x version), which consists of a cooler and also has an excellent overclocking potential out of package is maybe the the worth king in this segment.