Compare Daniel Elazar’s three creates of political cultureDescribe how social differences in between the states can shape attitudes around the duty of government and citizen participationDiscuss the main objections of Daniel Elazar’s theory

Some states, such as Alaska, space endowed with organic resources. They have the right to use your oil or natural gas reserves to their benefit to fund education and learning or minimize taxes. Other states, choose Florida, space favored v a climate that attracts tourists and also retirees every winter, drawing in profits to support infrastructure renovations throughout the state. These distinctions can bring about strategic benefits in the financial fortunes the a state, which can translate into differences in the levels of counting that need to be built up from citizens.

You are watching: Which of the following would best characterize traditional, individualistic political culture?

But their financial fortunes are just one component of what makes individual claims unique. Theorists have long proposed that claims are additionally unique as a duty of your differing political cultures, or their attitudes and also beliefs about the functions and expectations the the government. In the book, American Federalism: A watch from the States, Daniel Elazar an initial theorized in 1966 that the united States can be split into three distinctive political cultures: moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic. The diffusion the these cultures throughout the United states is attributed to the migratory trends of immigrants who settled in and spread out across the country from the east to the west coast. These inhabitants had distinct political and religious values that influenced their beliefs about the proper function of government, the require for citizens involvement in the autonomous process, and also the duty of politics parties.


\"*\"

Daniel Elazar posited the the unified States can be divided geographically right into three species of politics cultures—individualistic, moralistic, and also traditionalistic—which spread out with the migratory patterns of immigrants across the country.


Moralistic political Culture

In Elazar’s framework, claims with a moralistic politics culture see the federal government as a means to far better society and promote the basic welfare. They mean political officials to be honest in their dealings with others, put the understanding of the civilization they serve over their own, and also commit to boosting the area they represent. The political process is viewed in a optimistic light and not as a automobile tainted through corruption. In fact, citizen in moralistic societies have small patience because that corruption and believe that politicians need to be motivated by a desire to benefit the neighborhood rather 보다 by a should profit financially native service.

Moralistic states therefore tend to assistance an expanded function for government. They are an ext likely to think government need to promote the basic welfare by allocating funds to programs the will benefit the poor. In addition, they see it together the duty of windy officials to advocate for new programs the will advantage marginal citizen or deal with public plan problems, also when public press to carry out so is nonexistent.

The moral release political culture developed among the Puritans in upper new England. After several generations, these settlers relocated westward, and their worths diffused across the peak of the United claims to the upper an excellent Lakes. In the center of the 1800s, Scandinavians and also Northern Europeans join this team of settlers and also reinforced the Puritans’ values. Together, these teams pushed additional west through the northern section of the Midwest and also West and then follow me the West Coast.<1>

States that identify with this culture value citizen engagement and desire citizens participation in all develops of political affairs. In Elazar’s model, citizens native moralistic states must be more likely to donate their time and/or resources to political campaigns and also to vote. This occurs for two main reasons. First, state law is likely to make it less complicated for residents to register and to vote since mass authorized is valued. Second, citizens who hail native moralistic states have to be much more likely come vote due to the fact that elections are truly contested. In various other words, candidates will certainly be less likely to run unopposed and more likely to confront genuine competition native a qualified opponent. According to Elazar, the heightened vain is a role of individuals’ believing the public service is a worthwhile endeavor and also an honorable profession.

Individualistic politics Culture

States that align through Elazar’s individualistic politics culture watch the federal government as a device for addressing problems that matter to separation, personal, instance citizens and also for pursuing individual goals. World in this culture interact v the federal government in the very same manner lock would communicate with a marketplace. They suppose the federal government to administer goods and also services they view as essential, and also the windy officials and also bureaucrats who provide them intend to it is in compensated for their efforts. The focus is on conference individual needs and private goals rather than on offer the best interests of everyone in the community. New policies will certainly be enacted if politicians can use them come garner assistance from voters or other interested stakeholders, or if over there is good demand for these services on the component of individuals.

According to Elazar, the individualist political culture originated with inhabitants from non-Puritan England and also Germany. The an initial settlements to be in the mid-Atlantic region of brand-new York, Pennsylvania, and brand-new Jersey and diffused into the middle portion of the United states in a fairly straight line from Ohio come Wyoming.

Given their emphasis on follow individual objectives, claims with one individualistic perspective will tend to development tax breaks as a method of trying to an increase a state’s economic situation or as a device for promoting individual initiative and entrepreneurship. Because that instance, new Jersey governor chris Christie made headlines in 2015 when mentioning the incentives he offered to tempt businesses to the state. Christie encouraged a number of businesses to move to Camden, whereby unemployment has risen to almost 14 percent, by offering them with hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks.<2> The governor really hopes these corporate incentives will certainly spur job production for citizens who need employment in an financially depressed area that the state.

Since this theoretical lens assumes that the target of politics and the government is to advance individual interests, Elazar says that individuals are encouraged to become engaged in politics only if they have a personal interest in this area or wish to it is in in charge of the delivery of federal government benefits. Castle will often tend to remain affiliated if they obtain enjoyment from your participation or rewards in the form of patronage appointments or jae won compensation. Together a result of these personal motivations, citizen in individualistic states will often tend to be an ext tolerant the corruption among their politics leaders and less likely to see politics as a noble job in which every citizens must engage.

Finally, Elazar says that in individualistic states, electoral competition walk not seek to recognize the candidate with the finest ideas. Rather it pits against each other political parties that room well organized and also compete directly for votes. Voters are loyal to the candidates who host the very same party affiliation lock do. Together a result, unlike the instance in moralistic cultures, voters carry out not pay much attention to the personalities of the candidates when deciding how to vote and also are much less tolerant the third-party candidates.

Traditionalistic politics Culture

Given the prominence of slavery in that is formation, a traditionalistic politics culture, in Elazar’s argument, sees the federal government as crucial to maintaining the existing social order, the standing quo. Only elites belonging in the politics enterprise, and as a result, brand-new public plans will be advanced only if lock reinforce the beliefs and also interests that those in power.

Elazar associates traditionalistic political culture with the southern section of the unified States, where it developed in the upper areas of Virginia and Kentucky prior to spreading to the Deep South and the Southwest. Prefer the individualistic culture, the traditionalistic society believes in the prominence of the individual. Yet instead the profiting from corporate ventures, settlers in traditionalistic states tied their financial fortunes come the necessity of slavery on plantations transparent the South.

When chosen officials execute not prioritize public policies that benefit them, those on the social and economic edge of culture can it is in plagued through poverty and also pervasive health problems. Because that example, although the map below shows the poverty is a problem throughout the whole United States, the South has actually the highest incidence. Follow to the Centers for condition Control and also Prevention, the South likewise leads the nation in self-reported obesity, closely followed by the Midwest.

See more: Where Was Cinderella Filmed, The 2021 House Filming Locations

<3> These statistics present obstacles for lawmakers not only in the short term but also in the long term, since they have to prioritize fiscal constraints in the confront of farming demand because that services.